A Look Back at the Beginnings of a Monumental Mystery Series

by Roger Johns

Few would argue that Sue Grafton created an iconic (classic, definitive, infinitely appealing…insert your superlative of choice, here) crime fiction character when she brought Kinsey Millhone to the page, way back in 1982, with the publication of “A is for Alibi”. Well, okay, some may argue, but I ain’t listening. For my money, Kinsey Millhone is one of the finest PI creations of the modern era, and I return to these novels for entertainment and as inspiration for my own writing. Has it really been 42 years—nearly half a century—since Grafton introduced us to Kinsey Millhone and the endlessly inventive mysteries in which her character played the starring role?

Who is this character, and where did she come from, and how did Grafton feel about her? All good questions, and for those interested in answers, a great place to start is with “Kinsey and Me”, the 2013 volume from Grafton in which she shares a wealth of detail about herself, her character, and the Alphabet Mystery franchise (as her books came to be known, because the title of each begins with the phrase “__ is for …”, with successive letters of the alphabet occupying that initial blank).

This book is rare look at the origins of Grafton’s development of and relationship

with her main character. In the beginning, it’s a collection of short stories about Kinsey Millhone. It is also part memoir in the form of essays and introductory material, and part memoir (in the back half of the book) in the form of stories featuring a lesser-known character of hers, Kit Blue, whom the flyleaf copy tells us is “a younger version of Sue herself.”

Over my years of attending mystery conferences and conventions, and all my bookstore (and other) appearances in between, during which I’ve had countless conversations with fellow mystery readers and writers, I’ve discovered that relatively few are even aware of “Kinsey and Me”.

As a fan of the series and the character, I find the book nothing short of fascinating. As a writer of fiction, I find the book nothing short of essential. As a writer of crime fiction, I find it indispensable, in terms of how it so judiciously illuminates Grafton’s fiction with the facts her life. The book is a moving testament to how one can use fiction as a route to gracefully coming to grips with a having been dealt a challenging hand early in life, as well as an excellent look at how a skilled author can adapt a character and a concept to long form and short form fiction. This book delivered, for me, on several levels, and is part of my go-to library of books that keep my imagination stoked and my love of crime fiction (as a reader and a writer) running in high gear. I highly recommend it.

ROGER JOHNS is a former corporate lawyer, retired college professor, and the author of the Wallace Hartman Mysteries from St. Martin’s Press: Dark River Rising and River of Secrets. His short fiction has been published by, among others, Saturday Evening Post, Alfred Hitchcock Mystery Magazine, the Mystery Weekly Magazine, Dark City Crime & Mystery Magazine, Yellow Mama, After Dinner Conversation: The Philosophy & Ethics Short Story Magazine, and Black Petals Science Fiction.  He is the 2018 Georgia Author of the Year (Detective·Mystery Category), and a two-time finalist for the Killer Nashville Silver Falchion Award. Along with Kim Conrey, he authors the quarterly column If You Only Have An Hour: Time-Saving Tips and Tricks for Managing Your Writing Career for Page Turner Magazine, published by the Georgia Writers Museum and the Atlanta Writers Club.

Probation & Parole — What’s the Deal?

One of the questions writers often ask relates to the difference between probation and parole. If you’re writing crime fiction, as many readers of this blog do, you may have a character who is involved in the system as one of the kept or a keeper.

While they both involve some form of supervised release, they serve distinct purposes and are applied under different circumstances.

Probation:

Probation is a court-ordered sanction imposed on an individual instead of, or in addition to, incarceration. It is typically granted as part of the sentencing process for a criminal offense. Rather than serving time behind bars, the individual is often allowed to remain in the community under specific conditions set by the court and supervised by a probation officer. These conditions often include regular check-ins with the probation officer, adherence to curfews, employment requirements, and participation in rehabilitative programs such as drug or alcohol treatment.

The goal of probation is rehabilitation while maintaining public safety. By allowing individuals to remain in the community, probation provides an opportunity for them to address underlying issues, such as substance abuse or mental health concerns, and reintegrate into society as law-abiding citizens. However, violating the terms of probation can result in consequences such as additional sanctions, fines, or even incarceration.

Parole:

Parole, on the other hand, occurs after an individual has already been incarcerated and is imposed after release from prison. Depending on the state, parole eligibility may be determined by a parole board or similar authority based on various factors, including the individual’s behavior in prison, their risk of reoffending, and their potential for rehabilitation. Similar to probation, parole comes with conditions that must be followed, and parolees are supervised by parole officers. These conditions may include regular meetings with the parole officer, maintaining employment, refraining from drug or alcohol use, and avoiding contact with victims or co-conspirators

In California, parole follows the competition of a determinate period of incarceration, or for offenders serving “life” sentences. A recent new hybrid of post release supervision sends offenders who committed less severe felonies to county probation for supervision. It kind of makes your head spin. Even the inmates don’t know which type of supervision they face.

There is also a trend in a few states to eliminate or reduce the use of parole after prison. California often releases non-serious and non-violent felons without any supervision at all. Don’t think for a moment that it is about reform, or what’s best for the community. It’s a budget reduction mechanism. Administrations get anxious when parole violation rates creep up. I spend many afternoons in the Governor’s Office explaining why people violate parole–new crime, abscond from supervision, refuse to follow the parole agent’s instructions, and fail to leave their victims alone. Someone in the halls of power far removed from the communities we live in to eliminate parole supervision for a large swath of offenders. If they aren’t on parole they can’t violate. If they can’t violate, then they can’t come back to prison. Dollars are saved in parole cost and prison costs. But what’s the cost to public safety? Mull that one over for a while…

Key Differences:

While both probation and parole involve supervised release in the community, there are several key differences between the two. Colin Conway, an author pal with the Public Safety Writers Association cam cup with this spiffy infographic to highlight the differences:

If you’re writing a probation officer or a parolee into your story. Make sure to do a little research into the supervision agency involved. The terms, the length of supervision, and who does the supervision varies from state to state. It adds a lot in terms of you authenticity

James L’Etoile uses his twenty-nine years behind bars as an influence in his award-winning novels, short stories, and screenplays. He is a former associate warden in a maximum-security prison, a hostage negotiator, and director of California’s state parole system. His novels have been shortlisted or awarded the Lefty, Anthony, Silver Falchion, and the Public Safety Writers Award. Face of Greed is his most recent novel. Look for Served Cold and River of Lies, coming in 2024. You can find out more at www.jamesletoile.com

Perseverance

By Brian Thiem: When I was in my MFA (Master of Fine Arts—Creative Writing) program ten years ago, I heard repeatedly that the most important trait of successful writers is perseverance. I was fortunate (lucky or blessed are also appropriate explanations) to be signed by a literary agent a month after graduation. Then a few months later, the amazing Paula Munier of Talcott Notch Literary Agency negotiated a three-book deal for the Detective Matt Sinclair series.

Over the next two years or so, I rewrote that first book and wrote two more for the series. I was well into writing the fourth book, when the publisher told me they were not interested in continuing the series. I was shattered. Reviews said the third book was the best, that Matt Sinclair had many more stories in him. I could’ve written more Matt Sinclair adventures for years.

I was reminded that the publishing industry can be fickle. Sometimes, when a series doesn’t hit the bestseller lists, publishers move on to another author. Paula told me to come up with a new series and start writing the first book for it.

So, I did. Authors often say that their ideas for a book begin with the question of, What If? I had been living in the Hilton Head area for two years and had been invited to join the sheriff’s Cold Case Team, a group of retired law enforcement professionals who met every month or so to look at a cold case—typically an unsolved homicide from years ago.

I thought: what if, instead of this group of old guys (and gals) doing their case review by reading the old reports and listening to an active sheriff investigator’s presentation, they took a more active approach? What if one of the “old” retired detectives was somewhat younger than the others, had moved to an “active adult” community (like where I live), and after his wife of thirty years suddenly died, he found he had no purpose in life? Then, what if there was a murder across the street from that retired detective, and he was asked to help out?

I had the premise for a story and a main character. I began writing. Over the next two years, I rewrote the story three times with the help of my agent and many fellow writers. I called it Spartina Island, based on the fictional setting I created. Paula pitched it to publishers but got no bites. Again, I was crushed. But I did what Paula suggested. I came up with a new idea and wrote another book. She pitched it, and again, got no bites from publishers. Paula suggested I write a stand-alone novel. I came up with a new idea, this time about a main character who wasn’t a cop. I spent the next year or two writing it, and then—you guessed it—no interest from publishers.

I thought long and hard about giving up. But Paula wouldn’t have it. She thought the market had changed and with a rewrite, Spartina Island would be a hit series. I revised it. And waited. And waited.

Two months ago, I signed a contract for a four-book series with Severn River Publishing. The first book will be The Mudflats Murder Club, a rewritten version of that novel I started seven years ago. It will come out in the summer of 2025, followed shortly thereafter by book #2 in the series, of which I’m about halfway through the first draft.

Today, I totally understand why those professors, all published authors, in my MFA program told me perseverance was the most important trait of a writer. If I had given up after all those rejections, I would not be looking forward to sharing another four books with readers.

So, to those unpublished writer friends out there, don’t give up. If you write a book that no agent wants to take on, or no publisher wants to publish, write another one. If that goes nowhere, write another one. And keep the old ones, because as publishing trends change and of them could be rewritten and become the next #1 bestseller.

My First Blog

Hello my fellow writers,

I’ve been anticipating this first post for months.

I’ve never wanted to do anything half-assed and that includes everything I write. As a police officer, my mantra was to never sully my profession, or my reputation. Now as a writer, I struggle every day to string words together that makes sense.

At the moment, I’m in the final proofing stages of publishing my third crime novel and much of my energy has been to get it right. I’m also doing two presentations at the upcoming Atlanta Writer’s Conference and finetuning what I’m going to say, and my anxiety level is peaking.

That said, let me tell you about my career, one I feel so fortunate to have survived, and the honor I felt being allowed to carry that badge.

Once out of high school, I had no ambition of attending college, I never thought of myself as an intelligent person, I barely graduated to be honest and to this day, I thought I must have had an attention deficit disorder. I excelled in topics I was interested in, but struggled in the rest.

I wanted to be a pilot, it was my only dream, but that didn’t work out and I found myself putting in an application with the Hialeah Police Department in 1977.

Something happened to me in the academy that changed my life. I began to believe I wasn’t stupid, and I wanted to be more than what I was before. From that point on I began to ace every test, every challenge, both mental and physical and I carried that goal throughout my career, and still today as a writer.

I have not peaked as an author, and I doubt I ever will. All those years of daydreaming in English classes still haunt me, but I’m getting there.

My first book is a memoir of my time in law enforcement and how those years changed me, for better or worse.

In my next post, I’ll tell you one of the stories I don’t share with anyone other than those who have similar experiences.

So that’s me in a nutshell. Imperfect, but still here, still trying to do the right thing.

To the future,

Jeff

A Sleep or A Scrape

The March Trial of the Month looks back to the year 1845 and the murder trial of Albert Tirrell. Although old, the case offers the opportunity to think about the roles of defense attorneys and prosecutors that is still relevant today.

Twenty-two-year-old Albert Tirrell was no paragon of virtue. The scion of a wealthy Weymouth, Massachusetts family, he left his wife and two children to embark on a relationship with Maria Bickford, a prostitute living in a Boston brothel. Although they traveled and were constantly together, she refused to abandon her profession. Maria was successful in her work; she could afford a maid and expensive clothing. The relationship between Bickford and Tirrell was described as volatile. Maria reportedly said that she enjoyed quarreling with Albert because they had such a good time making up.

In September 1845, local authorities charged Albert with adultery for cohabitating with Maria while married. He surrendered, posted a bond, and promptly returned to her.

National Police Gazette, Public Domain, Wikimedia

Albert visited Maria at her “disreputable boarding house” after her last customer on October 26th, 1845. Late that evening, the proprietor saw and heard the couple arguing. The next morning, the proprietor and his wife heard a scream and a heavy thud from the upstairs room. They heard someone running down the stairs and out the door. Maria was found on her back, a neck wound nearly decapitating her. Someone had also set fire to the bed on which she lay. At the foot of the bed was a bloody razor. A man’s walking stick and vest were found in the room spattered with blood. They also found a letter with the initials A.J.T. to M.A.B.

At about the same time, Albert Tirrell arrived at a nearby stable, and requested a horse. He had gotten into a little scrape, he reported. When the police tried to find Tirrell, they discovered he had fled. From Weymouth, Tirrell traveled through Vermont to Canada. From there, he boarded a ship bound for Liverpool. Bad weather forced the ship back to port. He journeyed to New York and booked a boat to New Orleans. He was, subsequently, arrested in Louisiana.

Tirrell hired Rufus Choate to defend him. A protege of Daniel Webster, Choate is considered one of the great American lawyers of the 19th Century. An outstanding orator, he was famous for delivering the “longest sentence known to man.” (1,219 words)

At trial, the prosecutor presented a strong circumstantial case, relying on the abovementioned facts. The witnesses, however, all resided in the brothel, and no one was beyond impeachment. Additionally, no one saw the actual crime. Still, robust evidence pointed toward Albert Tirrell.

Then Rufus Choate began his defense. His strategy was three-pronged. Maria may have killed herself, the defense argued. Choate’s associates impugned Maria’s character and suggested that suicide was “almost the natural death of persons of her character.” This theory suffered, however, from the violent nature of the injuries to her neck. The defense team also presented evidence of Albert’s good character before he was ensnared by the lascivious Maria. Choate suggested another resident of the boardinghouse might have committed the crime. And finally, the defense argued that if Tirrell had killed her, the offense occurred while he was sleepwalking.

A parade of friends and family testified to his sleepwalking; a habit that had begun as early as age six. In recent years, the somnambulism had increased in frequency and often manifested bizarre behaviors. These actions, according to his family, included window smashing and threatening his brother with a knife. The dean of the Harvard Medical School testified that a person in a somnambulistic state could rise, dress, kill, set a fire, and escape.

It is an essential element for most crimes, including murder, that the defendant has the intent to commit the offense. As a society, we criminalize behavior that a person knows or should know is wrong. But if the defendant does not understand, then no socially justified purpose is served by punishment. Usually, this applies to young children or to the insane.

On March 27th, 1845, Rufus Choate gave his closing argument to the jury. He began by telling them he did not intend to take up much of their time. Choate then talked for five hours non-stop. The court recessed for a meal, and when the trial resumed, the lawyer continued for another hour and a half. He spent much of the post-prandial argument focused on somnambulism.

The jury deliberated for two hours before acquitting Tirrell.

The strategy worked again when the prosecutor tried to convict Tirrell of arson for setting Maria’s room on fire.

Tirrell later wrote to Rufus Choate and asked the lawyer to return half his legal fee. He argued that he shouldn’t have to pay so much for a case where it had been too easy to persuade the jury of his innocence. History does not report that Choate sent any money back.

I do not want to close the blog and leave the impression that somnambulism serves as a get-out-of-jail card. According to an internet search, the defense has been tried perhaps sixty times. In most of those cases, it has not been successful. Sleep scientists report that Tirrell’s defense would not work today; his behaviors, especially the flight, cannot be explained by sleepwalking. Even Tirrell did not get away completely. He went to prison on the original adultery charge. The judge refused to dismiss the case and sentenced him to three years.

Delacroix: Lady Macbeth Sleepwalking. Creative Commons

Besides providing an interesting fact pattern, the case highlights the roles of the prosecutor and the defense. The government must prove each element of its case. A successful prosecution usually requires a clear message to explain the defendant’s actions. The prosecutor has a problem, even today, when a victim comes from a marginal or ostracized part of the community.

The defense, meanwhile, succeeds when it undermines even one necessary element of the government’s case. To do this, sometimes an astute lawyer presents a unified theory; other times, he or she scatter shoots. Sometimes, the defense merely picks at the government’s case, testing its reliability and challenging the credibility of the witnesses on which the government’s theory rests. In other cases, the attorney prosecutes the defense–putting forward an alternative theory that explains the evidence and exonerates the client.

Choate did a bit of all of these. He picked at and maligned the government’s evidence. He highlighted things the prosecutor had not brought–chiefly, an eyewitness. He also put forward several alternatives. Choate’s chief theory, and the one that keeps the murder case of Albert Tirrell in the public eye, was the defense of somnambulism. A novel defense that in this case, worked.

Albert Tirrell’s murder trial is the March Trial of the Month.

Now go get a good night’s sleep.

Mark Thielman

The Boomerang Mattress: My Life as a Spy

by William Walsh

As a new member to the Murder Book blog, I’m pleased to be able to write about a few of my passions—writing and investigations. This is my first post, which combines the two. I plan to write about the world of investigations from a point of view of 30 years of experience as a private investigator. Just when I thought I’d seen everything, something would happen that no one could have imagined. These things make for great fiction. To begin, my first job, besides being a paperboy and sloshing through the snow to toss the paper on someone’s front porch, I was a spy.

Now, I’m the director of creative writing at Reinhardt University, both in the undergraduate and the MFA programs, and one thing I emphasize is the use of every day life events in a writer’s fiction. Some of the most insignificant nuances of life can become interesting and useful in a story or novel, but we need to recognize them; however, their significance isn’t always apparent. When you think of something or hear of an event, write it in a note book for future use because you never know when it might be needed for a character. This is exactly what happened to me years ago.

I’m asked quite often how I became an investigator. I assure you, it was not planned. I always wanted to be in the FBI, and after graduating from college, I had the FBI application in hand all filled out for my career path; however, on the last page, the physical requirements were listed, which were easy-breezy. I had already been training and could run a 5-minute mile, do 150 pushups without stopping, and I even trained to hold my breath under water, though this was not a requirement. I figured the FBI would love to have a guy in their ranks who once held his breath underwater for 3:59. Yes, I know, seems impossible, one second short of four minutes. It’s true! It took about six months of training to hit that high mark. Why wouldn’t the FBI want a guy with such as skill? In retrospect, there probably wasn’t much call for that type of skill on a day-to-day basis. Nonetheless, I was ready if they needed me to swim across a river under water and undetected. 

Then there was the dreaded last requirement—a field agent could not be colorblind. And, of course, I am—red/green and blue/purple colorblind. So much so, my wife and kids often tell me to go change my clothes because the colors don’t match. 

Years later, one of the FBI agents I met during one of my surveillances told me how there were hundreds of jobs in the FBI other than being a field agent. At the time, I did not realize this, but more so, I figured that since I was “flawed,” the FBI wouldn’t want me. I had filled out the application at the office where I worked in the computer department (pretty high-tech for the times). On the back page, I read that one line over and over to make sure they knew what they were doing, and it wasn’t a typo. When that dream was dashed, I shredded the application and never looked back.

Fast forward several years later, I met the owner at Atlantic Investigations, Ralph Perdomo, who has since retired and moved to California. Ralph did not have anyone in his office who could write a decent report, plus he wanted to write a book detailing many of his investigations: the Rob Lowe Sex Tapes, the Lita Sullivan murder, and the biggest of all, the Sarah Tokars murder. Writing a book had always been one of his dreams. I knew nothing about investigations, but I had a skill he needed. I had been an editor, a researcher, had three college degrees under my belt, and two book publications. I could make any report read like Shakespeare or Erma Bombeck.

One of the most enjoyable aspects of being an investigator was conducting surveillance. I loved infiltrating a neighborhood covertly at four a.m. and remaining in position until there was activity on the suspect. Being invisible to everyone walking their dog, jogging, or strolling an infant through the neighborhood was just plain fun. On occasion, I’d get made by a nosey neighbor, but most of the time they accepted my reason for being in the area. Regardless of the investigation, I always had a pretext that was completely different than my true intent. On occasion, when there was absolutely no place to park my car, I’d talk someone into allowing me to sit in their driveway, which was always in view of the subject’s house. These nice neighbors thought I was there to rid the neighborhood of all the drug dealers. It might have been as boring as a worker’s compensation claim on a guy six houses away, but they bought my pretect. In fact, one time, I was conducting surveillance on their neighbor directly across the street. This retired guy brought me drinks throughout the day.

People often asked about the boredom of watching a house hour after hour. I never found it boring, as there was always something going on in the neighborhood to spark my interest. The greatest benefit was having the ability to surveil a subject and at the same time jotting down notes, lines of dialogue, and plot points in a notebook. I wrote many short sections of my novels all while on surveillance and judiciously watching the subject’s house. Once, while testifying, the judge did not believe me when I stated under oath that I had been on surveillance for sixteen hours waiting for this guy to leave. I had stayed up all night until he left at 8:00 a.m. The judge didn’t think anyone would do that. He was wrong. The longest I’ve stayed on one surveillance was twenty-two straight hours in Columbia, SC. 

I developed the skill to watch the subject’s house and write at the same time, by looking up every 20 or 30 seconds. In between those pockets of time, you can write a few solid sentences. Here’s a trick of the trade—if there’s a dog in the yard or on the porch, you don’t need to watch this house. Just watch the dog, because the second the dog hears the doorknob begin to turn, he’s at attention.

It doesn’t mean surveillance and investigations are not without danger. I wrote most of a first draft of my novel, The Boomerang Mattress, while on surveillance in a drug-ridden section of Atlanta. It took the better part of a year, but bit by bit, I wrote a page here and there. One case involved a pedophile I had investigated many years ago. Remember the insignificant nuances of life and how they can become useful in a novel. Well, here’s the proof.

In The Boomerang Mattress, I changed his name to Gordon Price, changed the locale, his physical makeup, and the nuances that might I.D. him. Having been released after eight years, a part of Price’s probation prohibited him from visiting the park, coaching kids’ sports, and any having contact with children outside of his immediate family. After I documented him on many occasions going to the park with his mother’s Great Dane and kids approaching him to pet this huge dog, he was arrested for violating his probation. 

My friends have asked for years why I haven’t written a novel about a private investigator, to which I always replied, it’s nothing like the movies or TV. No one wants to read about my life as a P.I. It took twenty years before I decided there was a story worth writing. I used the Price material as the beginning of the novel. 

Toward the end of the court proceedings when we recessed for ten minutes, one of the deputy sheriffs walked up to me in the hall and grabbed me by the elbow and pulled me toward the water fountain.

“I thought you ought’a know something,” he said, “that Price-fella, he said when he gets out of prison after serving his eighty percent, he’s gonna come looking for you.”

“Is that so?”

“Sure is.”

“You think I need to worry?”

“Not for a few years. But who knows, he may not make it that long in the big house. Pedophiles have a tough time. I say the over-under on him surviving is two years. Someone’s gonna beat him to death once he’s in the general population.”

“But in the event he comes looking for me.”

“Kill’im,” the deputy said. “Get yourself a Glock and make sure you know how to use it.”

“I know how to shoot.”

“No. I mean, know how to shoot without hesitation, no second thoughts. If that fuck-stick shows up, don’t give him an opportunity. Just finish it there. Ain’t none of us going to arrest you for that. It was self-defense as far as I’m concerned or will be. If you gotta put a knife in his hand, ain’t no one gonna question it.”

In the novel, all of the investigations are from my old cases. Of course, the details have been changed to shield identities. The Boomerang Mattress was written on the client’s dime over a year in my surveillance vehicle and has recently been completed. The main character is not me, and yet, how can he not be me. They are all my cases and notes from years of jotting them down.

Here’s my advice if you want to write fiction: keep a note book of ideas, stories, and conversations you hear, anything that has a nuance that might work down the line. You cannot remember all of it, so write it down to use years from now.

Kings River Life & Mysteryrat’s Maze Podcast: Join the Mystery Fun

by Lorie Lewis Ham

MurderBooks:Please welcome Lorie Lewis Ham to the blog, today. She is in her fourteenth year as the editor-in-chief and publisher of Kings River Life Magazine, and producer of the Mysteryrat’s Maze Podcast. Lorie, thank you for taking the time to be with us, today. Please tell us about the magazine, the podcast and your own mystery novels.

LORIE: Kings River Life Magazine will be celebrating its 14th anniversary in May of this year and it has been quite the adventure! We have expanded above and beyond what I ever would have imagined as far as what we cover, and our readership now is all over the world. In the beginning, we only published local articles, but that quickly changed. Now more than half of each issue is filled with mystery fun-book reviews and giveaways, mystery short stories, TV reviews, author interviews, and more! We also cover animal rescue, theatre, food, and travel. You can still find us at KingsRiverLife.com, but we also have a sister blog, KRL News & Reviews, at krlnews.com. New issues go up most weekends!

In 2018, we also started a mystery podcast with the goal of sharing mystery short stories and first chapters read by local actors—and not just read, but acted out. The podcast, entitled Mysteryrat’s Maze Mystery Podcast (named after KRL’s mystery section) has gone on to share stories by well-known and lesser knowns authors which include Cleo Coyle, Ellery Adams, Lori Rader-Day, Dennis Palumbo, Jon Land, Kate Carlisle, and so many more! To listen to the episodes, and subscribe to the podcast, you can go to mysteryratsmaze.podbean.com, and you can also find them in all the usual podcast places. The podcast has also been quite the adventure with so many author submissions that we are always booked into the next year, and I have been so pleased with how the stories have turned out!

My desire with both KRL and the podcast has been to share wonderful stories, books, etc. with our readers and listeners, and to support the mystery community (we do on occasion review some fantasy novels as well—especially those that cross over into mystery). As a mystery writer myself, I know how hard it can be at times to get your books reviewed—especially fellow small press and indie authors—and so while we do review books by authors with the bigger publishers as well, we try to make it a priority to cover as many small press and indies authors as we can. Our overall goal with KRL has been to support the arts in all its forms, as well as animal rescues, and unique small businesses.

If you don’t know me, you might wonder why I chose to create both a magazine and a podcast that features mystery! I have been reading mysteries ever since my brother introduced me to Sherlock Holmes as a teenager. I also started trying to write a mystery novel in my mid-teens. I published my first mystery novel, Murder In Four-Part Harmony in 2000. Since then I have published six mystery novels, with my latest one, One of You coming out in May of 2024. While on my journey of reading and writing mysteries, I discovered the wonderful and welcoming mystery community—especially Sisters in Crime. All of that led me to a desire to share that world of mystery with others, and to want to support fellow authors.

Speaking of other mystery writers, I wanted to share a little about what we publish in the area of stories. While we don’t publish as many mystery short stories as we used to, we do still publish several each year. We prefer that they not be any longer than 5000 words, and less is even better. Reprints are perfectly fine. The stories we have published have ranged from cozy stories to some very dark and twisted ones—we only ask that graphic language and sexual content be kept to a minimum. For the podcast we never go over 3000 words, and prefer between 500-2500. We are especially aware of language with the podcast as we try not to be marked as explicit with Apple. Most months we post two podcast episodes, but we are now taking a couple of months off each year. You can send your submissions for either to kingsriverlife@gmail[dot]com, just be sure to note which you are submitting for. Short stories for KRL can be sent at any time (we especially love mystery short stories that tie into holidays), we won’t be looking at podcast submissions again until this summer.

I hope both mystery readers and writers check out KRL and Mysteryrat’s Maze Podcast! You can also find us on Facebook and Instagram @krlmagazine!where you can hear an excerpt of my book One of Us, the first in a new series called The Tower District Mysteries. Book 2, One of You, will be out in May.

MurderBooks: Lorie, thanks again, for joining us today, and thank you for maintaining such an interesting opportunity to learn and be entertained, as well as such an wonderful opportunity for mystery writers to have their work enjoyed in both text and audio form.

BIO: You can learn more about Lorie and her writing on her website mysteryrat.com and find her on Facebook, and Instagram @krlmagazine & @lorielewishamauthor. She has been writing ever since she was a child. Her first song and poem were published when she was 13, and she has gone on to publish many articles, short stories, and poems throughout the years, as well as write for a local newspaper, and publish 6 mystery novels. You can hear an excerpt of her book One of Us, the first in a new series called The Tower District Mysteries, on the Mystery Rat’s Maze podcast. Book 2, in the series, One of You, will be out in May.

Lorie was hosted by Roger Johns.

Well, hello Everyone!

I’m not sure when or what I’m supposed to post, but I thought I would just say hello!

I grew up in South Florida, served 24 years in the Hialeah PD. Retired, wrote a memoir (don’t all cops?) and then moved on to writing crime fiction, sci-fi, short stories speculative fiction etc. I work harder now writing than I did on the street!

Thank for the invite.

Jeff

Compassionate Release–What’s it all about?

An author friend recently reached out for some information about compassionate release for a novel she was writing

FILE PHOTO: An inmate in a wheelchair passes a guard at the California Medical Facility prison in Vacaville, California, U.S., May 22, 2018. REUTERS/Lucy Nicholson/File Photo

Compassionate release guidelines vary from state to state but generally allow for an early release from prison in the event the inmate has less than six months to live. Medical science has some difficulty pinpointing the exact life expectancy of a terminally ill patient. The underlying idea is a sick and dying inmate is less likely to reoffend and could be with their family in their last days.

Sounds like a “compassionate” idea, right? Well, let’s take a deeper dive on what’s involved in an early release for medical reasons. But remember, low risk doesn’t mean no risk. There are documented cases where the inmate released early for medical reasons–terminally ill–beat a staff member in their nursing home, and sexually assaulted their caregivers.

Most states exclude the highest risk convicts from compassionate release consideration. Their risk to the public is simply too high. Murders, rapists, gang members, and sex offenders were removed from society for a reason and because they become ill, doesn’t necessarily diminish the threat they pose to the community. A careful public safety focused evaluation should guide the release consideration.

California recently softened its rules around who is eligible for compassionate release and eliminated the public safety concerns from consideration. All offenders are eligible except those sentenced to death, life without possibility of parole, or those convicted of murder of a peace officer. Murderers, gang hitmen, rapists, and child abusers are now eligible for early release.

California went even further. What was once consideration for terminally ill inmates in the last six months of their life has been expanded through new legislation. There is no longer a six month life expectancy requirement. If an inmate is suffering from a serious and advanced illness with an end of life trajectory, they are now eligible for early release. Even more, the compassionate release pool includes inmates who are medically incapacitated or functionally impaired where they are unable to care for themselves (walking, bathing, eating, even dementia) are now considered for early release.

Prison medical beds are the most expensive to operate, often costing thousands of dollars a day. Political pressure to reduce prison population and cost is at play here. The changes to the compassionate release eligibility rules might not be all about what’s best for the inmate and their treatment.

What’s that you say? Things might not be what they seem?

When inmates are released on medical parole (the new term for compassionate release), they are typically placed in community facilities for 24 hour nursing care. The inmate is removed from the expensive prison medical bed and the cost is shifted to Medicare in the nursing home bed. The state prison budget sees a savings and politicians can point to the lowering prison population. Everyone wins. Everyone except the victims, the public, and even the inmates themselves when they end up in unlicensed, and decertified community facilities.

The system is ripe for a savvy convict to game the system. Malingering is nothing new in prison. Inmate often fake their symptoms to get favorable treatment. What’s to prevent a bribe, or extortion to get an early out?

Compassionate release? Call it what it really is-a budget reduction strategy.

James L’Etoile uses his twenty-nine years behind bars as an influence in his award-winning novels, short stories, and screenplays. He is a former associate warden in a maximum-security prison, a hostage negotiator, and director of California’s state parole system. His novels have been shortlisted or awarded the Lefty, Anthony, Silver Falchion, and the Public Safety Writers Award. Face of Greed is his most recent novel. Look for Served Cold and River of Lies, coming in 2024. You can find out more at www.jamesletoile.com

Yes, Cops Can Do That

by Brian Thiem: I recently read a rant on social media by a man who said cops cannot ever enter his house—his castle as he called it—without his permission or a valid search warrant. Since I learned years ago to never get into an argument over social media—a waste of time—I scrolled to the next posting about cute kittens and puppies.

However, there are several exceptions to the search warrant or consent requirement, one of which is Exigent Circumstances. My brother and sister law enforcement officers already know this, but my fellow authors may be able to use this in their books.

When I was a young patrol officer early in my career, I was dispatched on a 415f call (disturbance—family fight). The dispatcher said the caller heard a man beating his wife in the house next door. My partner and I pulled up to the address, and a man came out of the house where the disturbance was reported to have occurred.

We told the man why we were there, and the man told us his wife was fine and we could leave. I advised him that we had a duty to see his wife and ensure she was okay. Since we were trained to keep spouses apart when investigating a family fight, both for the safely of the parties involved as well as the officers, I told the man to remain outside with my partner while I went to the house to check on his wife.

The man ordered us to leave his property and told us we could not enter his house without a search warrant, followed by, “I’m a lawyer, and I know the law.”

I calmly explained the law dealing with exigent circumstances, the public safety exception to a search warrant requirement, but he again ordered us to leave his property unless we had a search warrant. I instructed him to remain outside with my partner. I began to walk around him, and he pushed me back toward the street.

My partner and I handcuffed him, and I went to the house, where I found his wife suffering from a broken nose and fractured orbital bone around one of her eyes. We called an ambulance and arrested the husband for aggravated spousal battery, assault on a police officer, and resisting an officer in the performance of his duties.

The law often (but not always) makes sense in practical terms. It would be impractical in a situation such as this for the officers to leave the scene, call in a detective from home to type a search warrant, and find a judge at night for a signature, all while someone might need urgent medical care. Nor would it be practical for to leave the man at the scene to potentially do more harm to his wife until we had ensured she was okay.

By the way, the husband was visibly intoxicated when we encountered him, and he was a corporate attorney, with no criminal law experience, beyond some basics in constitutional law search and seizure that he had learned decades earlier in law school.